Knowing that I’m someone
who loves photography and photographs one might think that I also enjoy videos,
but I don’t. I don’t like videos on
Facebook. I don't like them when I'm checking the news. I don’t like vlogs. I don’t like listening to a YouTube DIY or
product review, (especially when it’s narrated by somebody who sounds like the
local motel owner). I have the
attention span of a dog or worse, so I’m not going to plod through anybody’s
“slice of life” clip with rapt attention.
If you’re one of the scooter bloggers I follow, I might have noticed
that you’ve mentioned the idea of tinkering with video now and then, and I hope
and pray that your wonderful blog never turns into a vlog.
I find that a still
photograph allows me to enter the scene that’s captured in it in my own mind in
a way that a video doesn’t allow me to do.
A video ruins a view of something for me with somebody’s incessant
yapping away about what’s being seen and it doesn’t allow me to experience the
view in my own way. The videographer
suggests or outright tells me what I should see, rather than allowing me to
simply see what he’s showing me. I find
the intrusion of his voice to be obnoxious as if were he yelling out in a
church or a library. Imagine if a visit to a museum came with the artist accompanying you to each of his works and telling you what you should be seeing in his creations. It would make his works of Art much the less if he failed to communicate what he wanted you to feel in the artworks themselves.
Enjoy your ride, but please don't narrate it on my account.
Too often a video
narrator has diarrhea of the mouth and constipation of ideas. He finds the need to keep on yammering even
if his thoughts aren’t well formed and he ends up seeming to be talking for the
sake of talking. All that unnecessary
yakking detracts from the view, rather than adding to it in a good way. Now add the buzz of a scooter or the roar of
a motorcycle in the background of everything that’s being said? No, thank you!
I like to read someone’s
thoughts. To read them; not hear
them. Written thoughts are generally
well put together because they’re not usually just spewed out off the cuff, or
off the tongue as it were. They often
involve the use of the delete and backspace keys, both of which are used about
as often when I’m writing as the space bar.
They’re polished in a way that extemporaneous speech typically isn’t, and
they serve a purpose other than simply allowing the narrator to enjoy the sound
of his own voice. I can usually read
the printed word a whole lot faster than I can listen to the same words being
spoken, especially when the speaker is breaking up his sentences with a bunch
of pauses, ums, and ers while he thinks of what’s going to be spoken next. Most importantly, though, I can process
written words more thoroughly when I can allow my brain to soak them up and reread
them if necessary.
No, sir, I'm not going to listen. I want to read!